Appendix O
Motion Entered in Oregon Supreme Court Oral Hearing
In the Supreme Court for the State of Oregon
| Pamela K Gaston, Sui Juris | ) | Case No. S47724 |
| Petitioner/Appellant | ) | |
| ) | MOTION TO UPHOLD | |
| V | ) | CHIEF PETITIONERS BALLOT |
| ) | TITLE AND SUMMARY FOR | |
| Hardy Myers, Attorney General | ) | MEASURE #1, 2002 ELECTION, |
| Respondent | ) | TO REPEAL THE AMENDED |
| ) | ARTICLE VII FROM THE | |
| ) | OREGON CONSTITUTION | |
| ) | ||
| ) | And AFFIDAVITS and EXHIBITS | |
| __________________________ | ) |
To: Oregon Supreme Court, En Banc
Comes now, Pamela K Gaston, Sui Juris, Free, Natural Person, State Citizen of the state of Oregon, to move the Court to UPHOLD CHIEF PETITIONERS BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY FOR MEASURE #1, 2002 ELECTION, TO REPEAL THE AMENDED ARTICLE VII FROM THE OREGON CONSTITUTION. Based on the following Affidavits and Exhibits, Petitioner challenges Attorney General Hardy Myers and Secretary of State Bill Bradbury’s responses. Petitioner demands a court of competent jurisdiction, in a court of Constitutional Judicial Due Process, as guaranteed unalienable by the Oregon and US Constitutions as a matter of Law.
Petitioner expects the Supreme Court to uphold the Ballot Title and Summary as follows.
REPEALS THE "LEG1SLATIVE STATUTORY SUPPLANTMENT"
TO ARTICLE VII OF THE OREGON CONSTITUTION
RESULT OF ‘YES` VOTE: "Yes" vote would repeal current legislative scheme controlling the
judicial system in Oregon, re-establishing original Constitutional Judicial System.
RESULT OF ‘NO’ VOTE: "No" vote would retain the current statutory scheme concerning the judges,
juries, courts, jurisdiction, and judicial system in Oregon.
SUMMARY: Prior to 1910, Oregon had a Constitutional Judicial system, Oregon Constitution, Article
VII, Original. In 1910, the legislature created, without a vote of the People, a Legislative Statutory Judicial
system, supplanting the Constitutional Judicial system. This measure repeals the Legislative Judicial
system, and restores the Constitutional Judicial system.
AFFIDAVIT
All statements herein are truthful, sworn testimony before God, as stated.
1. We are here as the Sovereign Authority in this state. You are all public elected officials who have taken
oaths to protect our Rights of Due Process and Equal Protection. These rights have been shamelessly
abused in the past and we are here to state that they will be observed in the future. We are demanding what
you have stated to be your shared principles and ideals. Constitutional Rights, open courts, equal access, a
search for Truth and Justice, Equal Protection of the Law for the People in Oregon.
2. We are placing the TRUTH on a MOUNTAIN OF LIES. The Attorney General’s office and the
Secretary of State have created a deceptive ballot title, to further the agenda of the STATE OF OREGON,
INC . to destroy the Oregon Constitution and enforce an unconstitutional, Corporate Socialist World Court
system in Oregon and in America. The Amended Article VII has been a FRAUD and DECEPTION from
the start, unconstitutional and therefore VOID OF LAW, and ENFORCEABLE. Today we are presenting
the evidence that undisputably proves the corrupt agenda of the current provisional, unconstitutional
government and completely discredits the facade being enforced and upheld by the Oregon Supreme Court
and Oregon Legislature.
3. In 1910, the legislature amended the Original Constitution to create a STATUTORY JUDICIAL
SYSTEM, the STATE OF OREGON INC. Under COLOR OF LAW, and giving the appearance of Law,
the legislature and the Supreme Court gave itself the authority to create a Process that would allow the
government to Violate the Public Trust without appearing to break the "law". The Oregon
government actively campaigns to deceive the Public that this scheme is Lawful. The following "legislative counsel
note” was inserted in front of the Original Article VII, and states that the Original
Constitution has been unlawfully "supplanted" and changes the Law into Statutes.
"Note: Original Article VII compiled below, has been supplanted in part by amended Article VII and in part by statutes enacted by the Legislative Assembly. The provisions of Original Article VII relating to courts, jurisdiction and the judicial system, by the terms of section 2 of amended Article VII are given the status of a statute and subject to change by statutes enacted by the Legislative Assembly, except so far as changed by amended Article VI]. "
4. Former prosecuting attorney Roger Weidner, in 1994, appeared in this very court, and told you that this
corruption was intolerable and that the People would not stand for the courts and public officials destroying
their Rights and Sovereignty. He told you what was coming and that the People would not tolerate outlaw
judges and public servants stealing their children, seizing their lands; their lives and sovereignty destroyed
by a TREASONOUS government. You disbarred Mr. Weidner for speaking out and confronting this huge
LIE that you are trying to uphold and enforce upon unknowing People. Jesse Lott. and Paul Kraxberger of
the Metro Observer have been building a political answer to this intolerable and insidious corruption.
Religious leaders like Lou Beres and Lon Mabon have been confronting the moral issues that have been
perverted as part of the destructive agenda to control the children and the families into accepting an
enforced ‘“culture" wherein their Constitutional Rights are non existent. The Families have been coming
into the Senate for ten years telling this corrupted government that they are at "lock and load" and that
unless this oppression stops, there is going to be bloodshed. When I quoted that in a Writ of Mandamus to
you last March, Hardy Myers sent his goons to Mt. Angel to threaten me and entrap my husband, saying we
were "threatening a public official", for stating the truth. The courts have proven to be completely
unaccountable, without exception, and you have continued to uphold statutory FRAUD, Violate your Oaths
to the People and allow an occupation of the Republic of Oregon by a foreign, unconstitutional jurisdiction
engaging in Domestic Violence against innocent Oregon State Citizens.
5. The Attorney General and the Secretary of State have NO lawful authority to block or amend the wording of a Citizens ballot title. The Justice Dept. and the Administrative Dept., along with the court, are creating estoppel to the Citizens unalienable Right to exercise their Constitutional Rights according to Article 1, section 1, wherein the PEOPLE are the only authority who can alter or abolish any part of the Constitution as they see tit. By refusing the initiatives that contain language that would “amend or abolish" a corrupt government, and by allowing themselves the authority to deceptively alter the words of the petitions, the Citizens are blocked from exercising their Constitutional Rights. United States constitution Article 4, Sec 4 states the United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion, and on Application of the legislature, or of the Executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. The only standard the legislature and courts must uphold is whether the initiative is Lawful, the initiative upholds an amended unconstitutional Process.
Oregon Constitution, Section 1. Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.
6. The amendment to the Original Article VII created inferior courts of "limited jurisdiction", another
estoppel deceptively designed to allow these unconstitutional courts to dismiss, deny and affirm without
opinion, denying the opportunity for Redress for the People. These courts effectively get rid
of the cases without Due Process of Law, and the attorneys and legislators call this "in the interest of the court" which
means “making the court money - interest" not to allow the People their Sovereign rights.
7. The initiative has been filed as a statutory amendment, because the Amendment being repealed has never
been constitutional, and therefore is null and void of Law. The amendment itself reduces the Original
Constitution to mere statutes, destroying the Law and Treasonous to the Law of Oregon. When the
amendment is repealed, the Original Constitution of Oregon will stand sparkling and TRUE, released
from the imprisonment of years of putrid slime of corrupt, deviant public officials who have buried it, along with
our Sovereignty.
8. Contained in this Motion are Exhibits and Records from the Archives and Public Records from US
District Court Case No. #98-1347-HU, that give undisputable proof that the Amendment to Article VH was
a forgery and was never Lawfully ratified by the People in 1910. The Records show that the governor who
signed the Proclamation on December 3, 1910, F.W. Benson, had stepped down in June, 1910, and was not
the governor at the time of his supposed signature. The Records show that “Jay
Bowerman" signed the oath to become Governor on JUNE 16th, 1910, one month before the amended VII initiative was created, in
July 1910. Further, the Proclamation has the name “F.W. Benson”, as
Secretary of State verifying his own signature as governor, which he was not, an unbelievable forgery and
falsification of Oath by the government of Oregon. The Records state the family of F. W. Benson claim Benson died in November,
1910.
9. Attached to this Motion are certified Records from the archives of the amendment as it was written in
1910. Clearly, the language was never adopted, as stated in the 1910 amendment, nor is the "1egislative
counsel note" that was attached to the Original Article VII included in the initiative. deceiving the Public
that the legislature intended to "supplant” the Original Constitution. The amendment was not incorporated
into the existing Oregon Constitution, but was deceptively placed beside the Original. a counterfeit Article
VII, blatantly usurping the Original Constitution and the Republican form of government
and the unalienable authority of the Citizens of Oregon. There is clearly not one word stating Constitutional
authority for the Bar Association to write legislation mandating that only its members can be a judge or
counsel. The bar members in the courts. the legislative and executive departments. and on committees and
in so called "public boards" have written the statutory scheme. wrote the statute that only Bar members
could be judges and counsel. for their own profit. even though the constitution places specific and
definite restrictions on the three branches being separate as a necessary check and balance. Article ll, Sec 10, states
that no legislator may hold a "lucrative office or appointment" with the state or US government , yet many
legislators are attorneys and bar members. The Constitution mandates no “titles of nobility”, yet attorneys
are called "Esquire". The Oregon Bar has created estoppel to citizens complaints against corrupt judges
and attorneys. Through their own rules they may refuse to advance a clients interests (opportunity to
recover damages from the bar) where it would conflict with the interests of the Bar (bar loses money on
damages). Now we see what "best interest of the system and best interest of the courts
really means! Best interest for the STATE OF OREGON, INC. Through the Bar manipulation of the non-lawyer legislators,
corrupt and traitorous public officials like Senator Neil Bryant and Rep. Kevin
Mannix have stripped the constitutional sovereignty from innocent state Citizens, placing unconstitutional initiatives before the
People with deceptive ballot titles, _just like Hardy Myers is attempting to do in our case right now.
10. This “hearing in Limine" today is a Violation of my Constitutional Judicial Due Process. I am not being allowed to make a complete Record for the Public Right to Know, and large amounts of testimony will not be heard by being restricted to 5-10 minutes. The court intentionally did not inform me of the the initiative upholds an amended unconstitutional Process.
Oregon Constitution, Section 1. Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.
6. The amendment to the Original Article VII created inferior courts of "limited jurisdiction", another
estoppel deceptively designed to allow these unconstitutional courts to dismiss, deny and affirm without
opinion, denying the opportunity for Redress for the People. These courts effectively get rid
of the cases without Due Process of Law, and the attorneys and legislators call this "in the interest of the court" which
means “making the court money - interest" not to allow the People their Sovereign rights.
7. The initiative has been filed as a statutory amendment, because the Amendment being repealed has never been constitutional, and therefore is null and void of Law. The amendment itself reduces the Original Constitution to mere statutes, destroying the Law and Treasonous to the Law of Oregon. When the amendment is repealed, the Original Constitution of Oregon will stand sparkling and TRUE, released from the imprisonment of years of putrid slime of corrupt, deviant public officials who have buried it, along with our Sovereignty.
8. Contained in this Motion are Exhibits and Records from the Archives and Public Records from US
District Court Case No. #98-1347-HU, that give undisputable proof that the Amendment to Article
VII was a forgery and was never Lawfully ratified by the People in 1910. The Records show that the governor who
signed the Proclamation on December 3, 1910, F.W. Benson, had stepped down in June, 1910, and was not
the governor at the time of his supposed signature. The Records show that “Jay
Bowerman" signed the oath to become Governor on JUNE 16th, 1910, one month before the amended VII initiative was created, in
July 1910. Further, the Proclamation has the name “F.W. Benson”, as Secretary of
State verifying his own signature as governor, which he was not, an unbelievable forgery and
falsification of Oath by the government of Oregon. The Records state the family of F. W. Benson claim Benson died in November,
1910.
9. Attached to this Motion are certified Records from the archives of the amendment as it was written in
1910. Clearly, the language was never adopted, as stated in the 1910 amendment, nor is the "1egislative
counsel note" that was attached to the Original Article VII included in the initiative. deceiving the Public
that the legislature intended to "supplant” the Original Constitution. The amendment was not incorporated
into the existing Oregon Constitution, but was deceptively placed beside the Original. a counterfeit Article
VII, blatantly usurping the Original Constitution and the Republican form of government
and the unalienable authority of the Citizens of Oregon. There is clearly not one word stating Constitutional
authority for the Bar Association to write legislation mandating that only its members can be a judge or
counsel. The bar members in the courts. the legislative and executive departments. and on committees and
in so called "public boards" have written the statutory scheme. wrote the statute that only Bar members
could be judges and counsel. for their own profit. even though the constitution places specific and
definite restrictions on the three branches being separate as a necessary check and balance. Article ll, Sec 10, states
that no legislator may hold a "lucrative office or appointment" with the state or US government , yet many
legislators are attorneys and bar members. The Constitution mandates no “titles of nobility”, yet attorneys
are called "Esquire". The Oregon Bar has created estoppel to citizens complaints against corrupt judges
and attorneys. Through their own rules they may refuse to advance a clients interests (opportunity to
recover damages from the bar) where it would conflict with the interests of the Bar (bar loses money on
damages). Now we see what "best interest of the system and best interest of the courts
really means! Best interest for the STATE OF OREGON, INC. Through the Bar manipulation of the non-lawyer legislators,
corrupt and traitorous public officials like Senator Neil Bryant and Rep. Kevin
Mannix have stripped the constitutional sovereignty from innocent state Citizens, placing unconstitutional initiatives before the
People with deceptive ballot titles, just like Hardy Myers is attempting to do in our case right now.
10. This “hearing in Limine" today is a Violation of my Constitutional Judicial Due Process. I am not
being allowed to make a complete Record for the Public Right to Know, and large amounts of testimony
will not be heard by being restricted to 5-10 minutes. The court intentionally did not inform me of the
hearing 10 days before, in order to subpoena adverse witnesses, John Kitzhaber, Hardy Myers and Wallace
Carson, who is "not participating" according to the paperwork, and who are personally accountable in my
cases before the court, not only this case. I am being limited to approximately ten minutes testimony to
address the court and defend this extreme case. Thousands of innocent people who never committed any
Crime have been destroyed for many years in this statutory rendering machine. The only true authority in
the courtroom are the People in the audience, and the court is blocking them from hearing relevant
information. The court do The attorney generals office have written a motion that Hardy Myers is not
going to appear, even though he is the opposing Party, and by Law, I am allowed to face my
opposing party openly, without purchase . Now at the last minute the Attorney generals office is saying they are going to
appear. The Citizens do not have the Right to not appear, and are fined and incarcerated for default and
failure to appear if they do not show. The Court is Violating my rights to Equal Process of Law.
11. I have studied the Constitution and find no section called "Justice Department". There is no
Lawful, constitutional authority for an Attorney General, although the Oregon Blue Book states that the Attorneys
general “have responsibility and authority under more than 350 state statutes". The Blue Book also states
that this “Justice Dept." was established by statute in 1891, creating Oregon state governments law firm.
The Attorney Generals office was enacted by the General Assembly in 1891 without Constitutional
authority for the General Assembly to create the office of the Attorney General. They elected prosecuting
attorneys to represent the state and the County. Section 8 of the act says "The Public
Interest of the State requiring the immediate services of an attorney general, this act shall effect on its approval by the
governor? The General Assembly nor the governor has any constitutional authority to create the office of
attorney general, under the term "PUBLIC INTEREST" which is the only authority given in said act. The
general assembly is only authorized to create offices by authority of the People. Nowhere is there a
provision for an Attorney General to have authority to change or alter or write an order to block a Citizen
Initiative. The Secretary of State is authorized only to insure that the proper number of votes are counted in
a certain district. At no time did the People authorize these usurpations, and have been deceived. kept in the
dark, unknowing of their Rights and intentionally kept ignorant by bar members of the court process. Also
which bar members who write and influence the legislation to enact the agenda of the World Court. now in
place and to whom the Oregon government officials have compromised and prostituted themselves
stealing and selling our constitution for profit. By manipulating the initiative process. and state employees writing
and passing their own statutory process, the Attorney General's "Department of Justice" has amassed more
than 215 assistant attorneys general to attack and prosecute state Citizens and Natural People.
12. The governor, attorney general, and solicitor general are spending exorbitant amounts of the taxpayers
money to fight the Citizens of Oregon in court after being accused for the least of infractions, where the
state prevails as the “victim", with ensuing fines and incarceration. Under this same "amended VII
statutory authority" the legislature has allowed the fictitious entity "STATE OF OREGON, INC to be the defendant
when a Citizen brings charges against a public official, completely blocking their fair hearing or equal
process. Constitutionally there must be a human injured party to make a Claim against another Natural
Person, and there has to be injury and probable cause to be a "crime". A Crime is based in Malum in se, or
on its face an immoral or injurious act, The agenda that has been statutorily created is a Corporate/Military
court, where "there is a rule, you broke it", using Malum Prohibitum, where something is a “crime” because
a rule was broken, and no evidence of any Crime or probable cause is required to fine and exploit People
for "interest", profit to the system. By these treacherous mechanisms, these departments are diverting
federal and state money to enact a "mixed war" of a state authority against the people. The Population of
Oregon is at risk to the abuse of the STATE OF OREGON, INC, and it’s non-constitutional courts. It has
become a one hands group, traitorously consolidated in its forces.
13. The Amended VII statutory usurpation of the Original constitutional court system in Oregon has created
a whole network of increasingly oppressive initiatives and constitutional amendments. The People are only
now realizing the entrenchment of the policies in the state of Oregon to control them and strip their
sovereignty. In the late 1980s there were meetings in Portland called Oregon Agenda for the l990's ,
Children and Families. Here it was determined that the Benchmarks Goals and Oregon Shines Agenda
would create a "new culture", wherein the People accept non constitutional courts and do not realize that
they are being stripped of their due process. This statutory agenda has allowed bar members to go into the
14. In the mid nineties, when Oregon proudly enacted the "Justice 2020 Vision for Oregon courts, the
unconstitutional statutory process expanded Nationally, and in 1999 there was established a non-
constitutional Global World Statutory Court with the very Processes developed first in Oregon. The
practice of the STATE OF OREGON, INC, for the Global agenda, has been to start the
oppressive and socialist programs first in the outlying counties, like in Bend, where
attorney/legislator Neil Bryant is Senator. In the Joint House and Senate Judiciary meetings, they call these "new" courts "small world
courts". They call these “courts" of "inferior process", of “limited judicial process". They are really agency
tribunals to enforce the policies of the STATE. They call these innocuous sounding names like Peer court,
Family court, Juvenile Court, Municipal Court, Drug Court, mental Health court, Community court,
Sanctions courts, traffic court, tax court, bankruptcy courts, land dispute and mediation courts, the list is
unending and new fraudulent constructs being "updated" all the time in the Law Commission.
15. In the outlying communities, quietly, the kinks have been worked out for these new programs, all on
state and federal money, being diverted without need for proof of public need, and with agencies
fraudulently creating a manipulated appearance of public need. The People, with the aid of the major
Media, are deceived to believe fearfully, and the STATE says they are going to "protect" them, not notifying
them that "protect” translates into "protect the interests (money) of the STATE", and that they are delegated
as slaves, a corporate commodity, property of the STATE. The whole concept is ludicrous that the STATE
would have an army of attorneys general to fight Citizens in court, when the state government IS the People,
and the People are the only True Authority.
16. These non—constitutional courts are the latest form of the evolving agenda for many years as we see
some of the steps over the years of bar members insidiously and covertly implementing a global profiteering
scheme. Beginning at least with the Amended VII supplanting of the Original Constitution, the bar member
and agency employed legislators and commission members have cemented their sphere of control over the
courts and laws by manipulating the intent of the initiatives to their own benefit. This rulemaking has
allowed such unconscionable policies as the public servants giving themselves immunity from damages
when they commit criminal acts against the Public; to allow the STATE to be the “victirn" when there is no
injured party or Lawful Crime committed; then initiatives are passed for "victims rights", translated the
state accuses and convicts every time; they unlawfully and without Public Authority or vote, passed statutes
to mandate that only Bar Association members could represent counsel in court and become judges,
breaching the three departments and stripping all semblance of separation of powers from the Oregon
government; by writing China Policy constitutional amendments that have completely usurped Oregon
sovereignty by incarcerating the accused before a jury trial has decided the facts and the law; by stripping all
“innocent until proven guilty of a Crime". also stripping the constitutional mandate that the state bears the
burden of proof against Natural Persons and State Citizens.
l7. In furtherance of this Corporate Socialist agenda, Neil Bryant and Kevin Mannix have crafted many
abominations, spawning from the House and Senate Judiciary Committee, a treasonous assembly engaging
in sedition against the Oregon Constitution, just as the Law Commission is also enacting. They are at this
time manipulating the Bill of Rights, holding closed meetings, writing initiatives like SB70 to criminalize,
prison for five years and &l00,000. Fines, for anyone who "threatens" or "verbally assaults" a public
servant, broadening the scope of stalking ordinances to be used against a newspaper and a
lawful protest to fraudulently restrict protestors and any who dare to speak in court or confront their criminal public servant
or judicial abusers.
18. In furtherance of this scheme, the legislature has created mandatory sentencing, and a whole host of
unconstitutional abominations that are falsely incarcerating thousands of prisoners, criminalizing them for
life, never given a trial by jury nor convicted of any Crime, no injured party and non violent
‘offenders", many routinely and unconstitutionally jailed for owing money, forced to work in debtors prisons, the Public
not realizing that these people are being processed without constitutional protections of their Inherent
Rights. The list is infinite, the manipulations unbelievable, the practiced and polished methods of deception
an assault on the average, honest person of integrity. The statutory scheme and the provisional regime is
well entrenched, you know the plans to further solidify the courts. Another big piece of the statutory
entrenchment was in January 1998, when the Legislature and the Supreme Courts unconstitutionally
abolished the District courts and consolidated them with the Circuit courts, having no
Lawful authority to do so. This consolidation was a major step toward abolishing the constitution completely in Oregon, and
subjecting Oregonians to the foreign and unknown World Court jurisdiction, the Goal and intent at this
time, and soon to be in place.
19. The rulemakers allow themselves the authority to act in their own authority and write the rules as they
wish by consensus, unseen to the Public is the absolute money motivation ofthe whole machine. The
unnaccountability starts with Kitzhaber, the fish rots from the head down, and the statutory schemes have
created “Multitudes of Offices" and "swam1s of officers” to "eat out the substance
of the People", no different than the tyrant King when the Bill of Rights was enacted. These multitudes of officers are acting
routinely in their own authority, in the same manner, from elected officials down to police and enforcers and
social workers. It is apparent to me from personal experience that these individuals have been acting in
their own authority for a long time. These public servants, and when I say these, I mean starting with a
whole network that has been blatantly committing criminal acts against us with the Public watching for four
years. By manipulating and exploiting the initiative process, these public servants allow themselves to be
immune, above the law and free to abuse their offices. They are colluding and racketeering and protecting
themselves and their fellow public servants under color of Law in corrupted courts, all for profit to the
STATE, in the "best interest of the court". I am personally injured from these criminal policies and actors
of the STATE, and I am in possession of the Records and the Evidence, the Undisputed Facts and the Jury
Verdict affirming that the Judges in Marion County and elected officials and agents are guilty by affirmative
defense of Racketeering and Conspiracy against us. You have refused to act to prosecute any criminal acts,
even conspiring at this time to protect Child pornographers Hazel Specs and Larry Lawson, and a black
market child selling operation running out of the SOSCF, but no accountability. The legislators claim they
have public hearings, but this is another facade. These "hearings", often
unannounced, are more agency tribunals where the agencies fill the hearings and go home with stuffed pockets to abuse more Citizens for
profit and job security to keep the system "sustainable", always protecting the money first and each other,
without exception.
20. The agenda is to abuse and exploit the initiative process to make rules by consensus, deceiving the
People, that criminalize every infraction, remove huge numbers of people from the voting and jury
population, make those who break a rule or owe a fine go to prison, where they work in independent prison
industries making pre fab housing for millions of Chinese or sustainable products for the STATE OF
OREGON, INC. Those who are not making the system "sustainable” will be forced to work, starting high
school, and having no options of "self employment". Governor Kitzhaber just signed a "Sustainability Act"
Executive Order, without authority and to further the World Court agenda, for Oregon to be the first in the
nation to be "sustainable" in one generation. The People are becoming aware of the
deception and the treasonous intent of the STATE OF OREGON, INC. And this provisional government that has taken over
our state.
21. The Attorney General response to Petitioners arguments do not factually dispute Petitioners claims. In
fact, the strongest defense was that Mrs. Gaston’s statements are "an erroneous view
of the law”, yet the Attorney General does not factually defend their position. The AG office states that the 1910 initiative was
"properly adopted", yet gives no proof; yet Petitioners are providing undisputed and credible evidence
discrediting the lawfulness of the adoption of this statutory scheme, and all of the
treasonous entanglements that have been spawned from it. The responses from the
Attorney General as well as the four attorney responses are evidence that the STATE OF OREGON, INC. has no defense to this testimony and
evidence, and their responses are evidence in themselves of the confusion of legal theories called "Law” in
Oregon today. The Oregon Constitution has been statutorily amended so many times that the overlay has
taken on the facade of a solid appearance of judicial process, that is opaque to most lay People. The
attorneys state that no one would understand the word "supplantment", yet supplant is the very word in the
legislative counsel note that was attached in 1910 to usurp the Original Article VII.
22. The intent of the initiative as written by Petitioners is clear as a bell, that once the Amendment is
repealled, the Authority of the People is restored and courts of Justice returned to the state of Oregon. We
will not tolerate being sold out to a world court sovereignty and expect you to tell these people the REAL
intent of your Justice 2020 program in plain language, as I am telling them, so they know you intend to strip
their sovereignty and sell them out completely, and very soon, sooner than your vision of Justice 2020
programs has outlined. I have the documents printed by the American Bar Association and disseminated at
the May 6 symposium at Portland State University, that describe the "vision" of the Justice 2020 statutory
scheme. In connection with the executive order Sustainability Act, a “sustainable" Oregon in one
generation, we see how dangerously things are shaping up. These documents describe the courts of
tomorrow, where everyone goes to an assessment center, where the validity of their claim is "assessed", and
then they pay for the type of hearings they get. They are "creating a culture" that will accept restrictions on
their sovereignty, not understanding what it feels like to have ever exercised it and being tried in non-
constitutional courts.
23. Judge Pamela Abernethy was quoted to say that the jury trial will be the last resort, not the first option.
Abemethy stated there would be new access to the courts; CDRC’s, Community Dispute Resolution Centers
and multi-option justice centers; This vision includes remote hearings, where the defendant is not allowed
to face his accusers openly. Judge Keys states that there will be arbitration where a non judge actually
decides the case, without a lot of the procedural complexities of a regualr trial." This Vision 2020 intends
to abolish "adversity” in the courts — “comrnunity involvement in non-adversarial problem solving" - no
more defendant, plaintiff and neutral judge to a jury decision, as the basic foundation of what a
constitutional court is. Justice Carson in 1995 proudly said Oregon courts are the "top in the nation" in the
"adoption of alterative forms of dispute resolution".
24. The Justice 2020 is a hate crime against innocent State Citizens, enacting in 1995 legislative statutory
arbitration and dispute resolution, mediation hearings of no due process. These are designed to "weed out"
the cases where the state is liable and block redress, also to act as tribunals to enforce agency compliance
with mandatory judicial orders, also manufactured without due process of Law. The Bar says they are
"experimenting” with "diversity”, through "flexible" programs and "peaceful" mandatory arbitration
hearings. There is an incestuous system of lawyer legislators who write the statutes, prosecutors who
prosecute the statutes, and judges who rule on the statutes, all of whom will now serve on juries as well.
No Rights for private, non licensed individuals in the community courts of tomorrow. Competition
eliminated, in one generation a culture that will salivate at the bell and ridicule constitutionalists as outdated
or mentally unstable, completely and inextricably brainwashed into slavery.
25. The ballot summary outlines the Amendment to Article VII as it appears in the constitution. This is
vague and deceptive, misleading the elector to think there are no other provisions for constitutional
courts in place. By manipulating vague statutes. there are arbitrary interpretations by biased and
prejudiced judges, attorneys and legislators. who are compromised to protect themselves. and care not whether these vague
“laws" are constitutional. These statutory provisions allow judges to make law
from the bench, and corrupt judges ask defendants if they understand the charges. and the People having no idea that to say they
understand is to agree with the judge that you "stand under" his unconstitutional corporate
jurisdiction, unknowingly and with the judge concealing the information, that you have given up your inalienable
Rights. The Oregon Law Commission is allowing itself the authority to “update" the statutes, to further
implement the Socialist policies and courts. This commission of rulemakers, at this time cannot
define words like ‘jiurisdiction" and "dependency" or answer any questions about the constitutional rights of the
parents in the state sanctioned kidnapping being enacted at this time, for huge profit to the STATE OF
OREGON, INC. In fact, Senator Bryant said in a hearing that the Adoption and Safe Families Act is
"critical" to the "flow" of the federal funding streams, along with the Environmental Protection Act and the
Drug Abuse Enforcement Act, the three pronged foundation for the federally funded agencies.
26. The game is up. The FRAUD is OBSCENE and the destruction intolerable. The vague and deceptive
language masks the real intent, as in "the state has an interest in" means interest, as in "making money off
of7’. The state says “best interest of children? meaning "profitable interest from abused children — the more
abused children the more profit". The state also calls the children "commodity" for their “federal funding
streams", and this exploitation of the words keeps the Public from seeing the real agenda as it has been
being put in to place. Through these deceptions the STATE OF OREGON, INC profits from the
exploitation and extortion of the People, violating their rights and blocking their opportunity for redress
without exception. The Oregon Statutory judicial system denies remedy and Due Process of Law. When
amended VII was enacted, it made justice in Oregon a debt, a commodity to be bartered. This made Oregon
twin ladies Liberty and Justice whores, pimped to the highest bidder and statutorily raped.
27 It is now seen that these mechanisms are methods for the global profiteers to implement a completely
controlled agenda, both major political parties are compromised to this agenda, as well as the Oregon
government completely compromised by this provisional regime of John Kitzhaber and his appointed fellow
traitors to the Citizens Sovereignty in Oregon. It is now come to light how dangerously close we are at this
time, possibly as early as Sept. 6, 2000, that the global statutory scheme will make a bold shift and Oregon
will lose her opportunity to exercise State Sovereignty, as well as the Personal Sovereignty as Natural
Innocent People and State Citizens. Are you selling us out to a United Nations Charter right now, as we are
confronting your agenda? Who will tell the TRUTH, and forewarn the People of the terrorists and perverts
who are pirates who have seized our Ship of State, and how they plan to profit from our destruction?
28. The Vision 2020 of Oregon government for the courts has placed every Person at extreme risk, and when this happens, the blood that is shed is on your hands, just like the henious ongoing abuse you are allowing every day to be enacted against children and families, arrogantly, with contempt for the Citizens, refusing to act in our behalf The Supreme Court and Appellate court judges have been going into the schools and holding court, perverting the minds of the children to accept courts of no due process. Judge Carson said in 1995 that the children will need to "cl1ange their attitudes, not only about the court system, but changing the justice system as a whole...we need to spend more time not in law school, but in grade school, changing perceptions about how things work and how the system works”. I KNOW this what you are doing, and I have been watching what you do, not what you say. You know you are engaging in compromised criminal acts for the STATE, and those who will not admit that the court is a facade and an act are LIARS and THIEVES. I have seen first hand for four years this is what you are doing, and you know you have the constitutional authority and obligation to act to protect Oregon Citizens from invasion and domestic violence. You also are well aware that I know in my own cases that you have for more than two years, without exception, refused to allow all hearings on our Writs to rescue our child from heinous criminal public servants.
29. The Oregon legislature never granted the Oregon Bar the authority to commit child abuse, to molest, to
pervert and to violate the welfare of children and minors. The Bar members are going into the schools with
questionnaires, with lewd and obscene motives and pedophile agendas. We have proven this also in our
own cases. You are at this moment protecting a pornographer/grade school teacher/ foster mother Hazel
Spees and have been knowingly for more than two years, with the state paying her defense, refusing to take
her teaching license, awarding her a half million dollar judgment against us for printing her confessions of
child sexual abuse ina newspaper, and adopting at least four more children to her and her family after her
crimes were publicly acknowledged and confessed. All of this and the retaliation of more than twelve cases
against my husband and myself to destroy us and conceal evidence of extreme government abuse, all
accomplished in the corrupted statutory process with more than twenty judges we have appeared in front
of. You also know that you have acted and colluded together against my husband and myself} to the point
where now Carson, Van Hoomison and Gillette are not sitting on our cases, after denying our fair hearing
and dismissing our extreme Writs without hearing. NONE OF YOU HAVE EVER ACTED TO PROTECT
US. This assembly refuses to take action to guarantee Oregon its Republican form of government, creating
an aristocracy and elitist judiciary, above the law, perjuring yourselves by Violating the Public Trust and
your oaths of office.
"Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading... We cannot condone this shocking conduct". If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and yr this is routine it should be corrected immediately" [LS. v. Tweel, 550 F2d 29Z 299~300.
"When one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in eject a false representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth. " State v. Coddington, 662 R2d 155, 135 Ariz. 480. (Ari; App. 1983).
30. You have two enbanc Motions properly before you at this time, Case #SC 47588 and SC S47598,
recently dismissed without hearing by Judge Van Hoomison. I move the Court at this time to act on these
two Writs of Mandamus, and immediately return our child to our protection and safety and stop the criminal
acts of the public agents and the courts against us, also to act on the Writ of Mandamus for a Summary
Judgment hearing for damages on the undisputed and jury decided facts in our Racketeering Case. You
took an oath to protect our Rights, and will finally act in our behalf The People are finished with corrupt
government in Oregon, finished with state sanctioned abusers attacking them and destroying them and using
the People’s money to do it. You WILL act on these motions or explain to the People by what authority you
think you are allowed to abuse me and deprive my rights to be heard and enforce prosecution of criminal
agents of the state. This assembly refuses to make restitution for damages to me and my family, also for the
People who have been mercilessly rendered by this treasonous, outlaw government.
3 l. You have the evidence before you. You and the Attorney Generals Office shall now answer to these charges, or give factual dispute. A Writ or law or ordinance is Void when there was no Lawful authority to have issued it. The officers acting under it are TRESPASSERS, for they are required to know whether the court has jurisdiction and cannot use their official positions to commit criminal acts and deprive Citizens Rights. You have heard the undisputed testimony, and have only one option remaining, to come clean and admit that the Amended statutory scheme is a FRAUD, and a DECEPTION and repeal the Amendment to Article VII and the legislative supplanting note. If you do not admit the established facts in this extreme and volatile situation you WILL explain to the People the TRUTHFUL INTENT and justify the corrupt practices that you are using to destroy us. We DEMAND to know the Nature and Cause of the Statutory Scheme, and that our Public Servants from here on out respect the CITIZENS rights, enforcing complete and equal accountability upon all who act in abuse of their authority in any Public official or elected capacity. We are telling you that this is over NOW. AFTER TODAY THE PEOPLE GET REDRESS AND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS PROTECTED BY OREGON PUBLIC SERVANTS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS. THIS CORRUPTION STOPS RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW. IN THE NAME OF GOD, SO SAY WE THE PEOPLE.
All Statements in this affidavit are established facts, court records and sworn testimony,
truthful before God, as stated.
Signed in this Day of Our Lord, .
August 9, 2000
____________________
Pamela K Gaston. Sui Juris
Chief Petitioner Initiative #1, 2002 election
treasurer Fifth Amendment Coalition
( co director with Will Gaston of A Voice For Children)