Welcome to the Just-US system.

Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964): Illegal search and seizure.

Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 475 (1966) (111 pages); 14 or 15 L.Ed. 2d ??: -- "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." You have the right to remain silent; that is, do not answer any questions, such as: What is your name? [My mother calls me son.] Where do you live? [In a house.] What is your educational level? [I can read, write and speak America’s English.] Where did you attend school? [In a building.] What is your SS number? Are you employed? Who is your employer? Are you married? Are you in insured? What is your religion? Do you have any scares? Did you see that stop sign? "Everything that you say can and WILL be used AGAINST you." Not for you! You are required to state your name on the record before court can obtain jurisdiction. The only one to testify against you is yourself. The Master asks the questions, the slave answers the questions. Bah! Also, one should always answer a question with a question, if possible. Do not volunteer any information or into their jurisdiction. In the present Just-US system you are the main witness and provider of evidence for the government's case. You can easily volunteer yourself right into the iron bar hotel. "You have the right to remain silent." However, if you remain silent you will waive your rights, since only a belligerent claimant can protect his rights. A claimant must know his rights, and know how and when to claim those rights. "There is a time to shut-up, a time put-up or speak-up and time to run before the dealing is down!" Welcome to the Mad Hatter’s tea party. Miller v US, 230 Fed 486,489 – "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional (guaranteed) right cannot be converted into a crime".

There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights."- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

Davis v Mississippi, 394 US 721 (1966): Your photograph and fingerprints are your property. Do not give these away. Do not sign anything, you sign manual [signature] is your property; also, do not give it away. Especially, do not sign fingerprint cards or booking sheets (hotel registry). They are required to have you sign on the fingerprint card before they can fingerprint you; signing means that you have given your consent. Going jail or prison is voluntary; you or your RE-present must sign the contracts. How many years of slavery are you willing to contract yourself into? Be prepared to receive a beating, because that is what these task masters do to unruly human (beast) resources (property). Welcome to the Crown’s largest Plantation! And, you though you were free!

Riverside v McLaughlin, 114 L Ed 2d 49 (1991) 500 US ---; 111 S.Ct. ----: Brought Davis forward added that unless they get one to voluntarily sign into their iron bar hotel they must let one go within seventy-two hours unless they get a warrant or indictment. However, if they play the psychiatric evaluation bit, then they may hold their victim 72 hours plus two days or possibly longer in most states; though, now under the Patriot Act, Law Enforcers can hold anyone for seven days as a suspected terrorist without probable cause, warrant, arrest, hearing, telephone call, counsel, bail or bond; expect in Hawaii and Alaska, which have recently abolished the Patriot Act. Who knows what else bureaucRatic morons will pull next! So, do not be surprised that once they have you, they may never let you go. If they want to keep you, they can and will trump-up more charges while you are in their custody and have no witnesses or evidence to your defense.

Samuel H. Sheppard v E. L. Maxwell, 86 S Ct 1507; 384 US 333; 16 L Ed 2d 600-621 (June 6, 1996): Supreme Court ruled "prejudicial publicity" had made trial a "carnival".

Faretta v California, 95 S Ct 2525; 422 US 806; 45 L Ed 2d 562 (1975): I can read, write, and speak America’s English, which is all I need to know to defend Myself. Education, Military background, work background, etc. is none of the STATE’s business. Remember one has the right to remain silent and everything that one says can and will be used against oneself, not for oneself. They can not arraign or sentence one if one is without representation. Defend ones self. Be ones self. NEVER Re-Present yourself. NEVER! Entrapment: Pro Se = Self Re-Presentation and temporary appointment to the State BAR. Beware! NEVER allow the Black Robe Devil or his Jesters ever to make refer to you as Pro Se or Pro Per or Pro anything. NEVER! Take EXCEPTION to the Devil’s Utterances. Move OBJECTION to the Jester’s Utterance. Only, that which is on the record can be appealed. Get it in on the record. In the last paragraph of Faretta, the US Supreme ruled that one who self-RE-Presents has "a fool for a client".

Briscoe v LaHue, 460 US 325, 75 L Ed2d 96 (1983) The Judge, Prosecutor, All Attorneys (yours included), Law Enforcers, Expert Witnesses (especially bribed, Psychiatrists and Psychologists) who perjure themselves to benefit the governments case have full immunity against prosecution both civil and criminal. Welcome to the Just-US system!

"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."