THE DISENFRANCHISED FATHER SYNDROME
Gerald L. Rowles, Ph.D.
PREFACE:
About 30 years ago, Holmes and Rahe published the Social Readjustment Rating
Scale which ranked life events as to their stress factor on a scale of 1-100.
The number 1 rank was "death of a spouse" (death of a child might be
presumed as very nearly equivalent) at 100, followed in 2nd place by Divorce
(73) 3rd place, Marital Separation (65) then; Changes in financial state (38)
Change in Living Conditions (25) Change in residence (20). Compare these with:
Christmas (12); Minor violations of law (11).
For a divorced dad, that's a stress value of 221 pts (plus the loss of the
children) out of the starting gate. Over time, those events may be compounded
and reiterated with each court trip and/or visitation sabotage. All too
frequently, we must also factor in the devastating effect of false allegations
of abuse.
Other research findings from the Holmes and Rahe scale:
The more life events one experiences, the more likely they are to get sick.
This is the key variable - "uncontrollable". To the degree that a
dad is involved in an adversarial divorce, the number and frequency of the
accompanying stressful life-events and the impact of the repeated experience of
helplessness is virtually inestimable in terms of describing what may be an
exponential experience of distress.
That some men are virtually or partially immobilized by emotional pain that is
bound up in a closed system, comes as no foreign notion to me, both as a
function of my research experience and of that experience outlined in the
comments that follow.
But there is more to the Divorced Dads issue than emotional distress, as Maggie
Gallagher has so aptly articulated in the linked column. I would point
particularly to the stats that indicate that an average of 56% of white males,
whether divorced or single, make less than $18,000 per year - or about $8.00 per
hour. The post- divorce schedule posted elsewhere on the DA*DI pages
demonstrates how vulnerable these men are to the potential for becoming
"deadbeat dads" when the court follows the "standard" award
for child support.
DISENFRANCHISED FATHERS:
In my experience working with more than 3000 divorced Fathers, and in some cases
their second families, through the DA*DI network, I originally outlined what I
then called the Defeated Father Syndrome. In listening to their personal
experiences and emotional responses to the experience of divorce and the
attendant loss of their child or children, these Fathers almost universally
shared a symptom cluster that bridged those symptoms associated with both
Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Their depression derived from loss of positive reinforcers, a sense of
helplessness, and a growing negative world view. Their PTSD derived from the
battleground of the adversarial family court system in which they repeatedly
found themselves on the losing end of a losing proposition - attempting to
maintain their roles as Fathers. It is not hyperbole to associate this
experience with the battleground. A 1995 headline in the Detroit News blared:
"Declaring War on America's Deadbeat Dads". The war is real, as are
its casualties - children and fathers, but the "deadbeat dad" is
largely fictional.
Recently, Dr. Sanford Braver published the results of his exhaustive 8-year
study of divorce. And in that account, he not only "shatters" the many
myths surrounding America's divorced dads, but he also explores the notion of
the disenfranchised dad. In a glaring refutation of cultural perception, Dr.
Braver found that "men have more trouble recovering emotionally" from
divorce. He notes that "most often the man - feels utterly powerless
because he can do nothing to prevent the breakup of the marriage." This is
entirely consistent with my experience in dealing with the DA*DI dads. Hence, I
attached the label Defeated. But this is an outcome-based label. It fails to
encompass the whole of the divorced, battle weary father experience and what
precipitates that sense of defeat.
Dr. Braver much more adequately captures the precipitating event in using the
label Disenfranchised. He reports, "Fathers are often obsessed with what
they perceive as the profound bias against them displayed by the courts and the
legal system." And the fact is that such a bias does exist, including the
presumption that all divorced dads are deadbeat dads.
Expanding on Dr. Braver's findings, Parke and Brott in Throwaway Dads takes us
another step closer to understanding the degree to which the contemporary myth
of the unfeeling, macho, uninvolved, "deadbeat", if not
"dangerous" dad belies the frequent, tragic-reality of the
post-divorce, disenfranchised, "visiting father." To their credit,
Parke and Brott take note of the fact that "hammering men over the
head" with their "wildly exaggerated ... shortcomings only fills them
with feelings of shame that serve to drive them further from their
families" ... and developing a sense of "being worthless and
powerless.
The definition of disenfranchised is "to deprive of political rights",
"to enslave", "to deprive of a franchise, of a legal right, or of
some privilege or immunity". Such is the process of becoming a
divorced dad - a disenfranchised parent. These definitions are becoming even
more relevant as the Child Support Enforcement statutes become more egregious -
e.g., depriving Fathers of their licenses to drive or practice their
professions.
The following stressors are common in Fathers who have been exposed to divorce
and the deeply painful loss of marital attachment and daily involvement in their
child(ren)'s life:
Most Fathers who become non-custodial parents struggle on valiantly for several years after the epoch event, attempting to maintain some kind of normalcy in their relationship with their offspring. But they gradually, and realistically, come to realize that what is lost is greater than what is preserved. They increasingly feel helpless to have a prominent influence in their child(ren)'s lives. Consequently, in many cases the motivation for career success is significantly diminished.
To the degree that the non-custodial Father was involved in his child(ren)'s
daily activities, and played an active and nurturant parenting role, the levels
of stress will be concomitantly exacerbated.
Almost immediately, however, the stressors listed above begin to form symptom
clusters that are most often associated with the following clinical syndromes.
Because of the singular and shared association with the trauma of divorce and
the loss of the Fatherhood role, as well as the frequency of occurrence, a
separate diagnostic entity is warranted - the Disenfranchised Father Syndrome.
Diagnosis of either disorder requires the presence of only four symptoms.
DEPRESSION
Symptoms:
P.T.S.D. (POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER)
Symptoms:
FIRST, THERAPY CAN HELP AVOID CHRONIC DISTRESS
How do we defend Fathers against the relentless societal juggernaut that drives
them into becoming portrayed as psuedo-felons and fictitious-deadbeats? We must
first accept the fact that the historic male caricature of the strong, unfeeling
and impervious patriarch is a myth in today's society. Many divorced
Fathers are the battle- weary casualties of a culture that no longer finds value
in Fatherhood, and a court system that is engaged in the self-fulfilling
prophecy that they will become deadbeats.
We must acknowledge that men can be weakened, and that they frequently become
disabled by the same emotional bonds that they have been enculturated to develop
with their children - before becoming divorced and disenfranchised.
Mental Illness, such as PTSD and/or Depression is disabling, displaying a
continuum of severity that substantially limits one or more of a Disenfranchised
Father's major life activities.
One way or another, dads experiencing several of the symptoms of the
Disenfranchised Father Syndrome should seek out a receptive therapist who will
not unnecessarily add to the blame game. But learning to expose the thought
patterns that maintain the dysphoria, and finding out about old feelings that
have grown callouses leading to rigidity is important, whether it be in groups
or one-to-one sessions.
CONCLUSIONS:
As the nationally syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker has so aptly surmised,
"The solution to deadbeat dads isn't criminalizing fathers, but allowing
them to be part of their children's lives. Tonight, in a nation where
fatherlessness is recognized as one of our most serious social problems, 42
percent of all children will sleep in a house where their biological father does
NOT live. ... The wonder isn't that we have deadbeat dads, but that we don't
have more."
I would suggest that today's Disenfranchised Father is in many, if not most
cases, exhibiting an emotional disability deriving from the divorce experience
that substantially limits one or more of his major life activities. I would
further suggest that evidence of that disability, other than psychological tests
for disordered mood, comes directly from a sketchy work history, and/or the
inability to function at optimal employment capacity.
It may very well be that Fathers who have been imprisoned for failure to meet
egregious support provisions, may in fact be imprisoned for emotional disability
- the Disenfranchised Father Syndrome - a self-fulfilling by-product of a
profoundly biased legal system. In the medical and psychiatric professions, when
the administered treatment inadvertently produces a negative impact on the
patient's well- being, it is known as an iatrogenic illness.
In the case of Divorced Dads, I don't believe that there is anything inadvertent
about this sometimes profoundly disabling iatrogenic outcome. Rather, it is a
disingenuously deliberate and biased, misapplication of the full power of the
State. We must resolve to restore equity, and the Fatherhood franchise - for the
health of our Dads, for the health of our Kids, and for the future health of our
Culture.
DA*DI's Home Page: http://www.dadi.org/default.htm