Love, Marriage, Hate
May 7, 2009
By Leonard Henderson 

For years, the battle has raged about the state condoning homosexual marriage.  Being a Christian myself, I certainly understand the moral outrage from that camp.

But having been a victim of NO FAULT DIVORCE, I have long questioned the attempts to pretend that marriage is anything SACRED in our society.

When I got dragged kicking and screaming into a "No Fault Divorce" in 1985, I was certainly aware of the Christian "Sanctity of Marriage" and especially the "Let no man put asunder" part.  I took my vows seriously and I put up with 15 years of HELL of "holding the marriage together" and her threats to "take everything" I ever worked for if she didn't get her way.  She finally DID IT anyway.   A woman can hardly resist the POWER sitting there on a Silver Platter- made available BY THE STATE.

See, here's the deal- The day that No Fault Divorce arrived (in the 1970's) was THE DAY MARRIAGE DIED.  See "Why No One is Married".  That guy in the ugly black dress certainly WILL "put it asunder".  Men are viewed as nothing but a paycheck and the one who gets the blame- FOR EVERYTHING

Oh sure, the Bridal Shops still do a "land office business" in the spring time.  Girls still dream of a "Big Church Wedding".   And the current commercials saying "He went to Jared's!" tells the girlies that a big brand name diamond is a prerequisite for the coitus.

It's a farce, a fraud, a fairy tale.

No matter how sincerely the bride and groom repeat their vows, no matter how vigorously the pastor or priest invocates, the words mean absolutely NOTHING.

So now we see homosexuals planning their "Big Church Wedding", both dressing as grooms or brides, and we experience some sort of cognitive dissonance.  Some of us think it's comical or absurd.  I guess that's soon going to be called "HATE".

Marriage between a Man and a Woman?  Nothing but a CONTRACT that is easily BROKEN.  The state makes money every possible way from the CONTRACT and profits from the downstream destruction when it blows up.

The Communist Manifesto clearly stated the intention to do away with marriage.  DONE!

So have the cohabiters "outsmarted the system"? 

Which one will turn selfish spoiled brat and BLOW IT UP?

Are you kidding?  People who cohabit do coitus.  Coitus is what causes BABIES.

The children being born to MARRIED COUPLES are 50% likely to soon be in "single parent households". 

And babies born in cohabiting are already "single parent".   (This was the original definition of "bastard")

We all know the STATE has devised ways to make a pile of money from BABIES, and they do lots of mucking around to make plenty of babies "freed for adoption".

After all, the homosexual "couples" are going to want to "start a family" as a product of their "love", and what they do instead of coitus doesn't make babies. Just so happens, the state can supply the demand.  

The cynical among us call it a "Social Experiment".  

The only logical, possible outcome is the destruction of our society. 

As planned?